Enforcement of the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation is coming very, very soon. Look busy. This regulation is not limited to companies based in the EU — it applies to any service anywhere in the world that can be used by citizens of the EU.
It’s less about data protection and more like a user’s bill of rights. That’s good. Cennydd has written a techie’s rough guide to GDPR.
The Open Data Institute’s Jeni Tennison wrote down her thoughts on how it could change data portability in particular. While she welcomes GDPR, she has some misgivings.
Blaine — who really needs to get a blog — shared his concerns in the form of the online equivalent of interpretive dance …a twitter thread (it’s called a thread because it inevitably gets all tangled, and it’s easy to break.)
The interesting thing about the so-called “cookie law” is that it makes no mention of cookies whatsoever. It doesn’t list any specific technology. Instead it states that any means of tracking or identifying users across websites requires disclosure. So if you’re setting a cookie just to manage state — so that users can log in, or keep items in a shopping basket — the legislation doesn’t apply. But as soon as your site allows a third-party to set a cookie, it’s banner time.
Under the old “cookie law”, using a third-party cookie-setting service like that meant you had to inform any of your users who were citizens of the EU. With GDPR, that changes. Now you have to get consent. A dismissible little overlay isn’t going to cut it any more. Implied consent isn’t enough.
Now this situation raises an interesting question. Who’s responsible for getting consent? Is it the site owner or the third party whose script is the conduit for the tracking?
I’m just using Google Analytics as an example here because it’s so widespread. This also applies to third-party sharing buttons — Twitter, Facebook, etc. — and of course, advertising.
In the case of advertising, it gets even thornier because quite often, the site owner has no idea which third party is about to do the tracking. Many, many sites use intermediary services (y’know, ’cause bloated ad scripts aren’t slowing down sites enough so let’s throw some just-in-time bidding into the mix too). You could get consent for the intermediary service, but not for the final advert — neither you nor your site’s user would have any idea what they were consenting to.
Interesting times. One way or another, a massive amount of the web — every website using Google Analytics, embedded YouTube videos, Facebook comments, embedded tweets, or third-party advertisements — will be liable under GDPR.
It’s almost as if the ubiquitous surveillance of people’s every move on the web wasn’t a very good idea in the first place.
This was originally posted on my own site.